With Tevez, West Ham are in deeper than a horny pig

We can go back and forth on West Ham, Premier League, Tevez and Manchester United all day, but instead of rehashing things I want to ask the well-informed Soccerlens readers some key questions.

Before that happens though, a couple of observations:

  • The Premier League will move to protect the validity of their earlier rulings before considering player welfare, club welfare or civil laws. In that scenario, the Premier League will not – can not – accept that Manchester United are dealing directly with Kia and Tevez.
  • West Ham are in a double bind. If they are reneging on their agreement with Kia and MSI they open themselves to prosecution and the excuse that “the former owners did this” is not going to float – it’s a business, and the business is liable.

    If West Ham let go and allow Tevez to join Manchester United without taking a transfer fee (they are entitled a fee from MSI, as the initial contracts state), they have then accepted that they did not own his economic registration and that will get the Premier League to bust their asses back to the Championship (if they won’t they will open a big can of worms and this time Sheffield United will actually have a case).

  • The only difference right now between the Mascherano transfer to Liverpool and the proposed Tevez move to Manchester United is the 27 April Premier League hearing where West Ham were fined for lying to the PL and for violating rule U18. If that’s it, this seems to be a case of the Premier League covering its ass.

Ok, on to the questions:

#1: Why is it so bad for third-parties (read corporations) to own football players?

#2: Can you please point out that section of the Premier League rules where it explicitly or implicitly states that non-club player ownership is ‘not acceptable’?

#3: If West Ham have ‘reneged’ on their agreement with MSI and assumed economic rights for Tevez, doesn’t that hold them liable to a very big lawsuit? Couldn’t MSI sue West Ham to the tune of 20-30m pounds?

Or, put another way, if someone borrowed your car and later, to save his ass from his company boss, claimed (with legal documentation) that the car was his, wouldn’t he be opening himself up for a ass-whopping legal case?

#4: Can West Ham simply cancel Tevez’s registration and and make him a ‘free’ agent, allowing him to join Manchester United?

#5: What exactly was the Mascherano deal between Liverpool, West Ham and the Premier League? Shouldn’t that be re-examined as well?

Looking forward to your answers.

Roy Carroll and His Broken Shamrock
Soccerlens wants you to come closer...

54 Comments

  1. Pete 12 July, 2007
  2. rancho 12 July, 2007
  3. Brian W 12 July, 2007
  4. John J 12 July, 2007
  5. Brian 12 July, 2007
  6. Ahmed Bilal 12 July, 2007
  7. Craig 12 July, 2007
  8. Ahmed Bilal 12 July, 2007
  9. CHRIS 12 July, 2007
  10. Craig 12 July, 2007
  11. TrevorH 12 July, 2007
  12. Mark 12 July, 2007
  13. Mark 12 July, 2007
  14. r... 12 July, 2007
  15. A 13 July, 2007
  16. Danny 13 July, 2007
  17. TomasHH 13 July, 2007
  18. TomasHH 13 July, 2007
  19. TomasHH 13 July, 2007
  20. Gautam 13 July, 2007
  21. Gautam 13 July, 2007
  22. NYSpursFan 13 July, 2007
  23. Andrei 13 July, 2007
  24. Ol' Devil 13 July, 2007
  25. Andrei 13 July, 2007
  26. aksjansmnsa,mnsjhrjkerhsdf,ms, vc 13 July, 2007
  27. Ahmed Bilal 13 July, 2007
  28. Ahmed Bilal 13 July, 2007
  29. Mach 13 July, 2007
  30. Gautam 13 July, 2007
  31. Andrei 13 July, 2007
  32. Gautam 13 July, 2007
  33. Andrei 13 July, 2007
  34. Gautam 13 July, 2007
  35. wick3d 13 July, 2007
  36. Rick 13 July, 2007
  37. Ahmed Bilal 13 July, 2007
  38. Phobos 13 July, 2007
  39. Liam O'Kelly 13 July, 2007
  40. Liam O'Kelly 13 July, 2007
  41. Rick 13 July, 2007
  42. Red Ranter 13 July, 2007
  43. Vineesh 13 July, 2007
  44. Liam O'Kelly 13 July, 2007
  45. Vineesh 13 July, 2007
  46. Vineesh 13 July, 2007
  47. DBeech 13 July, 2007
  48. karl 13 July, 2007
  49. Mach 14 July, 2007
  50. slaton 15 July, 2007
  51. slaton 15 July, 2007