Are Manchester City too petty to reject Manchester United’s request?

Earlier this week we heard that Manchester United had asked Manchester City to push forward their derby from 5th May to 6th May, keeping in mind that Manchester United play Milan away at San Siro on 2nd May, Wednesday night.

It’s not as bad as what Spurs had earlier (play in Sevilla on Thursday night, then play Chelsea on Saturday), but it’s tough considering United have been playing twice a week for a long time now and the injuries are putting a big strain on the squad.

While Chelsea had a Champions League match to consider on Tuesday and thus rejected Tottenham’s request to play on Sunday, Manchester City have no such commitments. In other words, Manchester City could very easily have delayed the game by a day, but they chose not to.

Why not? Is it because of the club rivalry? If so, it is a sad and negative choice made by City. Is it because they want to beat United so badly that they’ll take any advantage they can get? If so, devious, but still sad.

No issues though. Manchester United have little choice but to grit their teeth and pull through the final leg of the season. I find it a bit strange that a club that has no other commitments to honor and a club whose season is more or less over (they can’t really get relegated unless they lose 3 games really badly and Charlton win their next 3 by huge goal margins, and they can’t really challenge for Europe, you know) would chose to act like this.

Some people may call this as ‘standing up’ to a big club’s bullying, but this was anything BUT bullying. Manchester United will not complain about this (hopefully), and they’ll play without any grudges. The club rivalry puts in an extra edge to this situation, but there’s no need for City to not act honourably.

On BBC’s 606, there’s a City fan whose reaction to this was:

“Nice one City – why should we aid United’s title chances?”

If that’s how the club thinks, that’s a very petty reason to reject United’s request.

Master Baiter Mourinho prepares for war with Manchester United
No opposition, open goal - how long would Arsenal take to score?

60 Comments

  1. Pete 27 April, 2007
  2. Ed Harrison 27 April, 2007
  3. George 27 April, 2007
  4. Jonny 27 April, 2007
  5. Swiss Tony 27 April, 2007
  6. boothy 27 April, 2007
  7. Chris Crookes 27 April, 2007
  8. T. Henriksen 27 April, 2007
  9. dabz 27 April, 2007
  10. Mike F 27 April, 2007
  11. Ahmed Bilal 27 April, 2007
  12. martin 27 April, 2007
  13. Nigel 27 April, 2007
  14. Grassy_Knoll_Army 27 April, 2007
  15. Richard Mottershead 27 April, 2007
  16. Dave 27 April, 2007
  17. gavin hodge 27 April, 2007
  18. Mike 27 April, 2007
  19. bluemoon 27 April, 2007
  20. sam 27 April, 2007
  21. Jared 27 April, 2007
  22. tim 27 April, 2007
  23. Gaz 27 April, 2007
  24. gavin hodge 27 April, 2007
  25. Elbonf 27 April, 2007
  26. sam 27 April, 2007
  27. Nick 27 April, 2007
  28. sam 27 April, 2007
  29. Greg 27 April, 2007
  30. patrickblue 27 April, 2007
  31. Needles Mpenza 27 April, 2007
  32. Pete, London Blue 27 April, 2007
  33. Rob 27 April, 2007
  34. Ahmed Bilal 27 April, 2007
  35. dabz 27 April, 2007
  36. Diablo 27 April, 2007
  37. Robert 27 April, 2007
  38. Ahmed Bilal 27 April, 2007
  39. dabz 27 April, 2007
  40. Ahmed Bilal 27 April, 2007
  41. Bernie clifton 27 April, 2007
  42. HowieHok 27 April, 2007
  43. Simon Brown 27 April, 2007
  44. Matt 27 April, 2007
  45. Burnsy 9 27 April, 2007
  46. Azar 27 April, 2007
  47. Kienu 27 April, 2007
  48. Kienu 27 April, 2007
  49. Steve 28 April, 2007
  50. mand 28 April, 2007
  51. Ahmed Bilal 28 April, 2007
  52. Atta 28 April, 2007
  53. dabz 28 April, 2007
  54. Ahmed Bilal 28 April, 2007
  55. MickB 28 April, 2007
  56. sam 29 April, 2007
  57. dabz 29 April, 2007
  58. dabz 29 April, 2007
  59. dabz 29 April, 2007
  60. Ahmed Bilal 29 April, 2007